The Rise of Generative Design:

Redefining Creativity and Efficiency in AEC

Generative design isn’t just something cool to talk about anymore, it’s becoming a real driver of change in how we think about design and delivery in the AEC industry. By using AI-powered algorithms, design teams can now create thousands of design options within seconds, all based on a set of parameters, space constraints, materials, costs, and even environmental impact. This isn’t replacing designers; it’s giving them superpowers.

We’re seeing a shift away from traditional, linear design workflows and toward something a lot more dynamic, iterative, and informed. It's not about working faster for the sake of speed, it's about unlocking better, smarter decisions from the start. Phil Bernstein from Yale puts it well: “The real promise of generative design isn’t just speed. It’s about better decision-making, at scale, across disciplines” (Bernstein, 2024). That’s exactly the kind of thinking we need to move forward.

What is Generative Design?


At its core, generative design is a process where designers set a goal, define the constraints (like room size, sunlight needs, or structural load), and let AI explore a range of options that fit those needs. It’s not about removing the human, it’s about expanding what’s possible.

Autodesk, one of the key players here, describes it this way: “Rather than manually drawing plans, you’re setting goals, and letting the system find creative paths to meet them” (Autodesk, 2024), and it’s starting to change how design and construction teams engage with BIM and VDC, creating a space for designers to do more high-level tasks like refining intent, guiding decision-making, and collaborating across disciplines.

This is where things really start to shift. Instead of drawing and redrawing, we’re seeing early iterations that already account for things like structural feasibility or natural light exposure. It’s like making the switch from playing checkers to playing chess, with a better view of the board.

the-power-of-active-listening-in-sales

Where It’s Already Making a Difference


This is not just theoretical, firms are putting this into practice in really exciting ways:

Use Case Impact Example
Architecture Spatial and form optimization Gensler's flexible office design models for hybird workforce scenarios
Structural Engineering Load distribution, weight saving Arup's generative truss modeling for cost-effective bridges
MEP Design Clash-free, optimized routing Buro Happold's HVAC layout automation
Urban Planning Smart zoning, sustainability Sidewalk Lab's layout simulations for airflow, noise, and solar access

As Carlo Ratti from MIT’s Senseable City Lab puts it, “Computers are no longer just drawing tools, they are design collaborators” (Ratti, 2024). That collaborative role is exactly where generative design shines: it helps technical and creative teams work smarter, together, and earlier in the process.

It’s Not Just Design, It’s an Ops Advantage


This isn’t just a designer’s toy. Generative design has real implications for operations, especially for those of us focused on delivery, efficiency, and scaling quality across multiple teams or studios. It directly impacts how quickly a project moves through design cycles, how much material is used, and how confident we are in the design before moving to the construction phase.

Statistics has shown that firms cut design timelines by as much as 50% just by leveraging these tools. They’re reducing material waste, getting stakeholder buy-in faster, and running simulations that account for seismic activity, wind patterns, and occupancy, all upfront.

One example that stands out comes from a keynote at Autodesk’s Generative Design Summit, where Zach Kron shared: “By simulating thousands of options, we reduced steel tonnage by 18 percent, a $400K cost saving on one project” (Kron, 2024). That’s the kind of operational value clients care about.

McKinsey takes it a step further: “The value of generative design lies in its ability to consider what humans can’t, millions of scenarios in milliseconds” (McKinsey & Company, 2025). That’s where AI really earns its keep, doing the heavy lifting on the back end while we make the judgment calls.

Traditional vs Generative Design: What’s the Difference?


Feature Traditional Design Generative Design
Options Explored 2-10 Thousands
Time to Concept Weeks Days
Human Effort Manual AI-assisted
Design Constraints Linear Multi-variable
Client Interactivity Limited High

It’s not just about scale, it’s about freedom too. Instead of spending hours reworking options, you’re curating the best of what’s already been intelligently generated. And when clients can visually explore those options side by side, the decision-making process becomes faster, clearer, and more collaborative.

Implementation Challenges

The industry is still early in the adoption curve. A few things are holding firms back:

  • Skill Gaps : Most teams don’t yet have people who can script or model parametrically.

  • Disconnected Tools: There’s still friction between generative tools and downstream production software.

  • Change Fatigue: Moving from tried-and-true workflows to something new always takes effort, and buy-in.

But as the AEC Disruptors podcast put it recently, “Change is hard, but so is getting left behind” (AEC Disruptors, 2025). The good news is that firms don’t have to overhaul everything at once. Pilot programs, internal R&D, and small-scale experiments are a great way to start integrating generative thinking into how your teams operate.

What’s Next

We’re heading toward a future where generative design works in real time, in immersive environments, and is connected to everything from permitting to procurement. The next wave will include:

  • Real-time design feedback in AR/VR environments

  • Integrated cost and material analysis at the concept stage

  • AI-supported code compliance baked into the design model

At Vee Technologies, our architecture and engineering support teams are already working to bring this into practice. We’re building internal capabilities around Revit and Dynamo, exploring parametric modeling, and partnering with clients to support design automation that cuts effort and boosts delivery speed. Whether it’s improving clash detection or streamlining HVAC layouts, we’re already applying this kind of thinking, and we’re just getting started.

References:

  • Bernstein, Phil. Lecture, Yale School of Architecture, 2024.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTCoXL3iFag 

  • Autodesk. “What Is Generative Design?” Autodesk, 2024.

    https://www.autodesk.com/design-make/articles/generative-design-in-manufacturing

  • Gensler Research Institute. “Design Forecast 2025.” Gensler.

    https://www.gensler.com/publications/design-forecast/2025?q=design%20forecast

  • Kron, Zach. Keynote, Autodesk Generative Design Summit, 2024.

    Link Keynote

  • McKinsey & Company. “The Next Normal in Construction.” McKinsey & Company, 2025.

    https://www.mckinsey.com

  • MIT Senseable City Lab. MIT.

    https://senseable.mit.edu

  • Ratti, Carlo. Lecture, MIT Senseable City Lab, 2024.

    https://senseable.mit.edu/

  • AEC Disruptors. “Why Generative Design Matters Now.” AEC Disruptors Podcast, 2025.

    https://open.spotify.com/show/1wE02ze4DiWP33gTdzMJdl

  • https://matthewlarn.medium.com/the-future-of-design-leadership-in-the-era-of-ai-e56e75f68076

Marissa-Jacobson

Meet the Author

Marissa Jacobson - Senior Director Client Operations/BIM Management

Marissa Jacobson serves as the Senior Engineering Director of Client Operations and BIM Management at Vee Technologies. She has over 10 years of experience in architecture and engineering with extensive commercial, residential, and institutional project portfolios with an emphasis on design and management. Marissa fosters an environment of teamwork and ensures that strategy is clearly defined while overseeing design, quality, and technical performance. Her strong communication and client relationships skills enhance Vee Technologies process-driven management style.